Skip to Content

“Desk booking” itself isn’t the problem - your workflow and process design might be though...

A lot of organisations have “adoption” issues with space booking systems.  Most organisations don’t struggle with desk booking because people wilfully refuse to cooperate though.  They struggle because the booking system they’ve introduced doesn’t reflect how people actually plan their work lives, or match their workplace needs. What gets labelled as an adoption problem is usually something deeper: a mismatch between generic or idealistic software deployments and organisation-specific behaviour and needs.
12 January 2026 by
“Desk booking” itself isn’t the problem - your workflow and process design might be though...
James Kelly

Desk booking doesn’t fail because people don’t comply. 
It fails because systems don’t fit real working patterns or ways of working. 

 

The common assumption about deploying booking systems (and why it breaks) 

The assumption behind most desk booking rollouts is simple: 
“If we give people a tool and a policy, they’ll use it and follow it.” 
On paper, this makes sense. 

The intent is usually good — the system is there to help. In practice, this rarely plays out as expected. 

Licences are purchased... 
A system and workflows are set up...
Training is delivered...
Reports light up...

But behaviour doesn’t change in the way the data suggests it will. 
Too often: 
  • Desks look “booked” but sit empty 
  • Rooms are reserved “just in case”, or people don’t show up 
  • Recurring bookings linger long after patterns have changed 
The problem isn’t intent or user deceit. 
It’s system design. 
 

Generic systems, unique organisations 

A question: When you get into a new car, do you just start driving - because the car is designed to go on the road, be driven and to take you where you want to go? 

No!

You adjust the seat. 
You adjust the mirrors. 
You make sure the car fits you and your driving position. 
Otherwise, yes - the car will move - but it will be uncomfortable, distracting, and far harder to operate well. 
A car isn’t difficult to drive - it just needs to be set up for the person using it. 

The same applies to a space booking system.  Most desk booking platforms are deployed as one-size-fits-all systems - because they are designed to book desks and rooms.

But no two organisations actually work the same way...

  • Some teams are highly predictable. 
  • Others are fluid by design. 
  • Some staff plan weeks ahead. 
  • Others decide on the morning itself. 
  • Some organisations are comfortable with enforcement. 
  • Others rely heavily on trust and autonomy. 

When setting up a desk booking system, if you assume: 
  • everyone books proactively 
  • everyone plans in advance 
  • everyone uses the same process 
  • everyone will tick the same boxes 
  • everyone is comfortable with another app 

...it will always struggle somewhere.  

Just like driving a car, you need to make sure the system is set up and configured properly if you want people to use it effectively. 
 
Software is generic. 
Organisations aren’t. 

It’s important to draw on real expertise to avoid the pitfalls generic booking processes can create - and to configure your booking system accordingly. 
 
Where access design goes wrong 

Access design is about how people enter the system. 
This is often where problems start. 

Common friction points include: 

  • Separate logins or standalone apps 
  • Manual booking as a daily requirement 
  • Not accounting for unique user needs (such as permanently assigned spaces) 
  • Booking being the first step, not a natural part of daily work 
  • Treating all users as equally confident with consistent needs 


Each additional step out of an easy sequence increases friction. 
Each extra decision reduces accuracy. 
If using the system feels like thankless admin, people will minimise their interaction with it - or work around it entirely. 

 

Where process design breaks down 

Process design is about what the system expects people to do. 
Most desk booking tools assume that: 

  • people always know when they’re coming in 
  • people care which desk they sit at 
  • plans rarely change 
  • updating bookings is part of the job 
  • people will proactively go and book a desk 
In reality: 

  • plans shift constantly 
  • proximity matters more than desk numbers 
  • people prioritise outcomes, not administration 
  • booking quickly feels optional 
People just… don’t book. 
So behaviour adapts — and accuracy suffers. 
And the data you rely on to plan your space quietly disappears. 
 
When systems don’t reflect real needs and realities, people create workarounds. 
Those workarounds are what we later call “poor adoption”. 
 

Adoption is an outcome, not a goal 

This is the key shift in thinking. 
Adoption isn’t something you push. 
It’s something you earn - and evolve. 


When access is easy, and the process mirrors real behaviour: 
  • people don’t resist 
  • data becomes reliable 
  • ghost bookings fade away naturally 
What looks like an adoption issue is usually a design issue revealing itself. 
And critically, you need to be ready to adjust — not assume your day-one setup is where you’ll ultimately land. 
 

The real cost of getting your desk booking setup wrong...



T
he cost of failed desk booking isn’t the wasted software licence fee. 
It’s: 
  • decisions made on unreliable data 
  • desks given to teams “just in case” 
  • space over-provisioned for the wrong reasons 
  • repeated change initiatives to fix tooling problems 
  • loss of confidence in future workplace projects 
  • irritated staff 
Cheap software that doesn’t work is expensive. 
Value isn’t lost because software costs too much. 
It’s lost because outcomes are wrong. 
 

Why “here’s the software” isn’t enough 

Some software providers stop at delivery: 
  • licences issued 
  • onboarding completed 
  • documentation provided 
At that point, success quietly becomes the customer’s responsibility. 
But desk booking isn’t just a software deployment. 

It’s a workplace system - and it needs to be tested, adjusted, and allowed to evolve. 
It involves: 
  • human behaviour 
  • trust 
  • evolving patterns 
  • interpretation of data 
  • iteration over time 
Without expertise and ongoing ownership, even good tools struggle. 
You need practical experience - not just a product. 
 
What actually works: access & process design principles 


Across organisations that see consistent results, a few patterns repeat. 
1. Meet people where they already work 
Adoption improves when tools disappear into existing workflows. 
2. Assume variability, not consistency 
Good systems expect change — and adapt to it. 
3. Default intelligently 
Remove unnecessary decisions. Automate reversals. 
4. Design for trust, not control 
Fear produces compliance theatre, not accuracy. 
5. Let the system adapt to the organisation 
Not the other way around. 

 

Why this matters more in charities and the public sector 

Charities and public bodies operate under different pressures: 

  • intense budget scrutiny - we know every penny really counts
  • limited tolerance for wasted effort and resource 
  • mixed digital confidence 
  • sensitivity around monitoring and control 
  • strong human, relationship-led cultures 


In this context, heavy-handed or generic systems fail faster - and do more damage. 
In cost-constrained organisations, value isn’t about paying less. 
It’s about wasting less. 
 


The role of a genuine partner 

The most effective organisations don’t just buy software. 
They work with partners who: 
  • understand how their organisation works 
  • help design access around real workflows 
  • adapt processes as patterns evolve 
  • interpret data collaboratively 
  • invest in long-term success, not short-term deployment 
Software creates a system. 
Partners take responsibility for outcomes. 
 
A final thought 
Desk booking doesn’t fail because people resist change. 
It fails because systems ask too much of them — and then leave them to figure it out alone. 
The future of desk booking isn’t more features. 
It’s better access, better process design, and shared ownership of success. 
“Desk booking” itself isn’t the problem - your workflow and process design might be though...
James Kelly 12 January 2026
Share this post
Our blogs
Archive